RE: Heavy ion beams in fluka2011.2-linux-gfor64bit-gcc451-AA

Dear Anna

the fact you used the same input is immaterial. The random number sequence
*DID* change between the respins -> hence a relatively rare error can show
up with one respin and not with the other, even though nothing has
really changed apart a bug correction in completely unrelated parts of
the code.

Is this the run which crashed because of a floating exception or the one
experiencing too many rqmd rejections?

We need the input/random seed for both to look at the issues

                 Ciao
                Alfredo

+----------------------------------------------------------------------+
| Alfredo Ferrari || Tel.: +41.22.76.76119 |
| CERN-EN/STI || Fax.: +41.22.76.69474 |
| 1211 Geneva 23 || e-mail: Alfredo.Ferrari_at_cern.ch |
| Switzerland || |
+----------------------------------------------------------------------+

On Wed, 25 Jan 2012, Senger, Anna Dr. wrote:

>
> Dear Alfredo,
> I send you all possible files. I would like to repeat: I used the same input
> for version
>
> 2011.2.7
> respin: November 10th 2011
> Fluka2011.2 (March 2011) released on: March 25th 2011
>
> and I didn't have such problem
>
> Best regards
> Anna
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Alfredo Ferrari [mailto:alfredo.ferrari_at_cern.ch]
> Sent: Wed 25/01/2012 16:16
> To: Senger, Anna Dr.
> Cc: fluka-discuss_at_fluka.org
> Subject: Re: Heavy ion beams in fluka2011.2-linux-gfor64bit-gcc451-AA
>
> Hi
>
> there are no special limits and anyway nothing changed about heavy ions
> in between fluka2011.2.1/2/3/4/5/6/7/8/9/10. The only differences are bug
> corrections. If a problem appears now which did not show up before, it is
> just because random number sequences changed. In order to help to solve
> your issues you should send the input files and the corrsponding last
> random number (the one left inside fluka_xxxx before the crash).
>
> Best regards
> Alfredo
>
>
> +----------------------------------------------------------------------+
> | Alfredo Ferrari || Tel.: +41.22.76.76119 |
> | CERN-EN/STI || Fax.: +41.22.76.69474 |
> | 1211 Geneva 23 || e-mail: Alfredo.Ferrari_at_cern.ch |
> | Switzerland || |
> +----------------------------------------------------------------------+
>
> On Wed, 25 Jan 2012, Senger, Anna Dr. wrote:
>
> > Dear FLUKA experts,
> > I try different heavy ion beams. With Au-beam I had the problem which I
> already reported
> >
> > ( Abort called from rrqmd reason rqmd event are being rejected too often
> > Run stopped!
> > STOP rqmd event are being rejected too often)
> >
> > but if I take Hg- or U-beam, I have other problem:
> >
> > Program received signal 8 (SIGFPE): Floating-point exception.
> >
> > Backtrace for this error:
> > + /usr/lib/libgfortran.so.3(+0x16226) [0x7f7ee1d61226]
> > + /usr/lib/libgfortran.so.3(+0x17ade) [0x7f7ee1d62ade]
> > + /usr/lib/libgfortran.so.3(+0x1696a) [0x7f7ee1d6196a]
> > + /lib/libc.so.6(+0x321e0) [0x7f7ee15841e0]
> > + /lustre/cbm/user/kisselan/fluka/flukadpm3() [0x75d598]
> > + /lustre/cbm/user/kisselan/fluka/flukadpm3() [0x6e4438]
> > + /lustre/cbm/user/kisselan/fluka/flukadpm3() [0x67cf9f]
> > + /lustre/cbm/user/kisselan/fluka/flukadpm3() [0x68df02]
> > + /lustre/cbm/user/kisselan/fluka/flukadpm3() [0x6786bc]
> > + /lustre/cbm/user/kisselan/fluka/flukadpm3() [0x414a5e]
> > + /lustre/cbm/user/kisselan/fluka/flukadpm3() [0xb1a64a]
> > + /lustre/cbm/user/kisselan/fluka/flukadpm3() [0xc11df2]
> > + /lustre/cbm/user/kisselan/fluka/flukadpm3() [0x95b5e2]
> > + /lustre/cbm/user/kisselan/fluka/flukadpm3() [0x8268a7]
> > + /lustre/cbm/user/kisselan/fluka/flukadpm3() [0x80aafb]
> > + /lustre/cbm/user/kisselan/fluka/flukadpm3() [0x40c98c]
> > + /lib/libc.so.6(__libc_start_main+0xfd) [0x7f7ee1570c4d]
> > + /lustre/cbm/user/kisselan/fluka/flukadpm3() [0x40c889]
> >
> > Is there any limits for heavy ion beams (A or/and Z) in new FLUKA?
> >
> > Best regards
> > Anna Senger
> >
>
>
>
--8323328-2025225631-1327656835=:49318--
Received on Fri Jan 27 2012 - 11:06:53 CET