Re: Re: [fluka-discuss]: Tally segment like MCNP

From: 毕远杰 <biyuanjie_at_tsinghua.org.cn>
Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2013 07:17:19 +0800 (CST)

Dear Vittorio,

What does it mean "define very fine usrbdx"? Should I define extra regions in the geometry just for scoring? This may increase the CPU time.

Best wishes
Yuanjie

> -----原始邮件-----
> 发件人: "Vittorio Boccone" <Vittorio.Boccone_at_cern.ch>
> 发送时间: 2013年11月16日 星期六
> 收件人: "毕远杰" <biyuanjie_at_tsinghua.org.cn>
> 抄送: fluka-discuss <fluka-discuss_at_fluka.org>
> 主题: Re: [fluka-discuss]: Tally segment like MCNP
>
> Dear Yuanjie,
> not that I know. You can define very fine usrbdx and merge the unwanted cell together in the post-processing.
> As an alternative you use custom scoring with an external function (I know Alberto Fasso will not be happy
> about this suggestion :D)
>
> Best
> V.
>
> --
>
> !!! Please take note that my main e-mail address will not be
> !!! valid anymore starting from 1st January 2014.
> !!!
> !!! Please use those addresses instead:
> !!! Professional: dr.vittorio.boccone_at_ieee.org
> !!! Private: vittorio.boccone_at_gmail.com
>
> Dr. Vittorio Boccone - University of Geneva
>
> o Address:
> UniGe: Département de physique nucléaire et corpusculaire
> 24 Quai Ernest-Ansermet, CH-1211 Geneve 4, Switzerland
> CERN: CERN, CH-1211 Geneve 23, Switzerland
>
> o E-mail:
> dr.vittorio.boccone_at_ieee.org (professional)
> vittorio.boccone_at_gmail.com (private)
>
> On 15 Nov 2013, at 02:20, 毕远杰 <biyuanjie_at_tsinghua.org.cn> wrote:
>
> > Dear FLuka usrers,
> >
> > I find there is tally segment card FSn in MCNP to subdivide a cell or a surface into segments for scoring
> > purpose without having to specify extra cells just for tallying. Does FLUKA have similar ability?
> > This is usefull when there is nonuniform radioactivity in a cylindrical container.
> > I want to mesh the surface, and record the double differential current of each surface element using usrbdx.
> >
> > Best wishes
> > Yuanjie
> >
>
Received on Mon Nov 18 2013 - 02:54:07 CET