Re: [fluka-discuss]: RE: feature reduced with the upgrade of flair version 2. : user-1D plots

From: Francesco Cerutti <Francesco.Cerutti_at_cern.ch>
Date: Mon, 2 Jun 2014 19:51:09 +0200

Dear Sebastien,

I think that the mentioned Flair option can easily be restored, however I
would like to recall Vasilis' point: the spectrum integration is already
available inside the _sum.lis file, where you can find the cumulative
spectrum, giving partial and total integral values.

Ciao

Francesco

**************************************************
Francesco Cerutti
CERN-EN/STI
CH-1211 Geneva 23
Switzerland
tel. ++41 22 7678962
fax ++41 22 7668854

On Mon, 2 Jun 2014, wurth wrote:

> Hello Vasilis,
>
> I understand.
> I don't know about the other users, but I use this plotting option a lot.
>
> So in my own selfish way, I would be glad if this one was restored.
>
> But of course, I can get it back by some other way like I did in the
> pre-flair times with gnuplot or excel, or even with flair by using the
> gnuplot command window and issuing the adequate command. A little bit tedious
> but it works.
>
> Regards.
> Sebastien.
>
>
> Le 2014-06-02 16:12, Vasilis Vlachoudis a écrit :
>> Hi Sebastien,
>>
>> I've tried to minimize the options in order to avoid the confusion of
>> the users, so I left only
>> two choices the "normal" plotting and the "isolethargic". The DX*Y
>> no longer exists.
>>
>> You can make your integration from the _sum.lis using the cumulative
>> output.
>>
>> Maybe this specific one I can restore.
>>
>> V.
>>
>> ________________________________________
>> From: wurth [wurth_at_ipno.in2p3.fr]
>> Sent: 02 June 2014 14:43
>> To: Vasilis Vlachoudis
>> Cc: Fluka discuss (fluka-discuss_at_fluka.org)
>> Subject: feature reduced with the upgrade of flair version 2. : user-1D
>> plots
>>
>> Hello Vasilis,
>>
>> Thanks for the great work.
>>
>> I have a question : with the new version of flair, whenever a USER-1D
>> plot is of interest, for example for a usrtrack card result :
>>
>> Now, in the field "value" we got only 2 choices : "Y" or "<X>*Y",
>> whereas before we got several other choices and the very interesting
>> "DX*Y" which was very helpful to integrate immediately over E.
>>
>> Is this bad luck or is there something that I missed?
>>
>> Thanks a lot.
>> Cheers.
>>
>> Sebastien.
>
>
>
Received on Mon Jun 02 2014 - 21:10:08 CEST