Re: [fluka-discuss]: Nucleus-nucleus interactions

From: Ferreira De Almeida Lourenco, Ana <am.lourenco_at_ucl.ac.uk>
Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2015 14:29:13 +0000

Many thanks Giuseppe, you explain it very well.

Best wishes,
Ana

________________________________________
De: Giuseppe Battistoni <Giuseppe.Battistoni_at_mi.infn.it>
Enviado: 8 de julho de 2015 14:26
Para: Ferreira De Almeida Lourenco, Ana
Cc: Yuri Simeonov; alfredo.ferrari_at_cern.ch; Vittorio Boccone; Angelo Infantino; Giuseppe Battistoni; fluka-discuss_at_fluka.org
Assunto: Re: [fluka-discuss]: Nucleus-nucleus interactions

Dear Ana
ldpm3qmd and ldpmqmd are equivalent and they link
to dpmjet-3 model.
ldpm2qmd instead links to dpmjet-2, which is not only
a previous, and very different, version of dpmjet with respect to
dpmjet-3.
Dpmjet-2 is practically frozen since a few years, and can be used only for
few particular problems.
Dpmjet-3, instead, is now continuously developed
and is our strongly adviced choice, For instance its development is
benchmarked against recent LHC data.
Therefore: make use of ldpmqmd or, equivalently, ldpm3qmd

        Giuseppe

On Wed, 8 Jul 2015, Ferreira De Almeida Lourenco, Ana wrote:

> Dear All,
>
> Regarding this subject I have got a question: What is the difference of using ldpm3qmd, ldpm2qmd and ldpmqmd? Are they equivalent?
>
> Many thanks,
> Ana
>
> ________________________________________
> De: owner-fluka-discuss_at_mi.infn.it <owner-fluka-discuss_at_mi.infn.it> em nome de Alfredo Ferrari <alfredo.ferrari_at_cern.ch>
> Enviado: 8 de julho de 2015 11:29
> Para: Yuri Simeonov
> Cc: Vittorio Boccone; Angelo Infantino; Giuseppe Battistoni; fluka-discuss_at_fluka.org; alfredo.ferrari_at_cern.ch
> Assunto: Re: [fluka-discuss]: Nucleus-nucleus interactions
>
> Dear Yuri
>
> yes if use flukadpm3 all the times you are on the safe side
>
> Alfredo
>
>
> +----------------------------------------------------------------------+
> | Alfredo Ferrari || Tel.: +41.22.76.76119 |
> | CERN-EN/STI || Fax.: +41.22.76.69474 |
> | 1211 Geneva 23 || e-mail: Alfredo.Ferrari_at_cern.ch |
> | Switzerland || |
> +----------------------------------------------------------------------+
>
> On Wed, 8 Jul 2015, Yuri Simeonov wrote:
>
>> Dear Fluka Experts,
>>
>> thank you very much for your answers! So to sum it up:
>>
>> 1. Simulating H1(all Energies) and C12 (up to 125 MeV) flukahp is enough.
>> User Routines can be linked with lfluka.
>> 2. Simulating C12 above 125 MeV flukadpm3 must be used. User Routines must
>> be linked with ldpm3qmd.
>> 3. If I always use flukadpm3 (for H1 and C12, all Energies) I am on the safe
>> side?
>>
>> Regards
>> Yuri
>>
>> 2015-07-06 21:24 GMT+02:00 Vittorio Boccone <dr.vittorio.boccone_at_ieee.org>:
>> Dear Yuri, this seems a dirty hack ;)
>>
>> If you are used to run things with flukadpm3 just add it as a default
>> executable in Setting->Executable of flair and it will be added to
>> your .flair/flair.ini file such that at next boot flair will use
>> flukadpm3 instead of flukahp
>>
>> Vittorio
>>
>> On Mon, Jul 6, 2015 at 5:45 PM, Yuri Simeonov
>> <yuri.simeonov_at_gmail.com> wrote:
>> Dear Angelo, thank you for your answear. This way it is
>> working.
>>
>> And what about renaming "flukadpm3" to "flukahp" so that
>> fluka can always use the linked RQMD/DPMJET if needed
>> (E>0.125). Are there some disadvantages? I am looking for
>> some kind of a general solution. I work only with H1 and
>> C12 as projectiles.
>>
>> Regards
>> Yuri
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
> __________________________________________________________________________
> You can manage unsubscription from this mailing list at https://www.fluka.org/fluka.php?id=acc_info
>
>

__________________________________________________________________________
You can manage unsubscription from this mailing list at https://www.fluka.org/fluka.php?idc_info
Received on Wed Jul 08 2015 - 17:44:37 CEST

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Wed Jul 08 2015 - 17:44:38 CEST