Re: [fluka-discuss]: Nucleus-nucleus interactions

From: Ferreira De Almeida Lourenco, Ana <am.lourenco_at_ucl.ac.uk>
Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2015 14:09:46 +0000

Dear All,

Regarding this subject I have got a question: What is the difference of using ldpm3qmd, ldpm2qmd and ldpmqmd? Are they equivalent?

Many thanks,
Ana

________________________________________
De: owner-fluka-discuss_at_mi.infn.it <owner-fluka-discuss_at_mi.infn.it> em nome de Alfredo Ferrari <alfredo.ferrari_at_cern.ch>
Enviado: 8 de julho de 2015 11:29
Para: Yuri Simeonov
Cc: Vittorio Boccone; Angelo Infantino; Giuseppe Battistoni; fluka-discuss_at_fluka.org; alfredo.ferrari_at_cern.ch
Assunto: Re: [fluka-discuss]: Nucleus-nucleus interactions

Dear Yuri

yes if use flukadpm3 all the times you are on the safe side

               Alfredo


+----------------------------------------------------------------------+
| Alfredo Ferrari || Tel.: +41.22.76.76119 |
| CERN-EN/STI || Fax.: +41.22.76.69474 |
| 1211 Geneva 23 || e-mail: Alfredo.Ferrari_at_cern.ch |
| Switzerland || |
+----------------------------------------------------------------------+

On Wed, 8 Jul 2015, Yuri Simeonov wrote:

> Dear Fluka Experts,
>
> thank you very much for your answers! So to sum it up:
>
> 1. Simulating H1(all Energies) and C12 (up to 125 MeV) flukahp is enough.
> User Routines can be linked with lfluka.
> 2. Simulating C12 above 125 MeV flukadpm3 must be used. User Routines must
> be linked with ldpm3qmd.
> 3. If I always use flukadpm3 (for H1 and C12, all Energies) I am on the safe
> side?
>
> Regards
> Yuri
>
> 2015-07-06 21:24 GMT+02:00 Vittorio Boccone <dr.vittorio.boccone_at_ieee.org>:
> Dear Yuri, this seems a dirty hack ;)
>
> If you are used to run things with flukadpm3 just add it as a default
> executable in Setting->Executable of flair and it will be added to
> your .flair/flair.ini file such that at next boot flair will use
> flukadpm3 instead of flukahp
>
> Vittorio
>
> On Mon, Jul 6, 2015 at 5:45 PM, Yuri Simeonov
> <yuri.simeonov_at_gmail.com> wrote:
> Dear Angelo, thank you for your answear. This way it is
> working.
>
> And what about renaming "flukadpm3" to "flukahp" so that
> fluka can always use the linked RQMD/DPMJET if needed
> (E>0.125). Are there some disadvantages? I am looking for
> some kind of a general solution. I work only with H1 and
> C12 as projectiles.
>
> Regards
> Yuri
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>

__________________________________________________________________________
You can manage unsubscription from this mailing list at https://www.fluka.org/fluka.php?id=acc_info

__________________________________________________________________________
You can manage unsubscription from this mailing list at https://www.fluka.org/fluka.php?idc_info
Received on Wed Jul 08 2015 - 17:31:35 CEST

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Wed Jul 08 2015 - 17:31:36 CEST