Dear Anton and Fluka experts,
I'm sorry to e-mail again, I would very much appreciate it if you could help me with my previous question regarding artefacts at boundaries? Please see e-mail below.
Many thanks,
Ana
________________________________
De: owner-fluka-discuss_at_mi.infn.it <owner-fluka-discuss_at_mi.infn.it> em nome de Ferreira De Almeida Lourenco, Ana <am.lourenco_at_ucl.ac.uk>
Enviado: 5 de junho de 2016 13:24:24
Para: Anton Lechner; fluka-discuss_at_fluka.org
Assunto: [fluka-discuss]: Re: Boundary crossing artefacts: Fano test
Dear Anton,
Please find in attachment the input files and the source files.
Many thanks,
Ana
________________________________
De: Anton Lechner <Anton.Lechner_at_cern.ch>
Enviado: 5 de junho de 2016 13:09:55
Para: Ferreira De Almeida Lourenco, Ana; fluka-discuss_at_fluka.org
Assunto: RE: Boundary crossing artefacts: Fano test
Dear Ana,
Could you please send your input files?
Thanks!
Cheers, Anton
________________________________
From: owner-fluka-discuss_at_mi.infn.it [owner-fluka-discuss_at_mi.infn.it] on behalf of Ferreira De Almeida Lourenco, Ana [am.lourenco_at_ucl.ac.uk]
Sent: 05 June 2016 14:28
To: fluka-discuss_at_fluka.org
Subject: [fluka-discuss]: Boundary crossing artefacts: Fano test
Dear Fluka experts,
I've been performing a self-consistency test called the "Fano test" in Fluka. The test states that under charged equilibrium conditions (when dose is uniform), the charged particle fluence is independent of the mass density as long as the cross-sections are uniform.
After a few tests, the results show some artefacts at boundaries. I'm simulating an homogeneous plane-parallel proton beam of 250 MeV (discarding nuclear interactions) in water. After a build-up region of 40 cm (the range of the beam in water), there is charged-particle equilibrium (CPE) as you can see in the graph below, where dose was scored with depth in cm. The CPE region starts at -6cm where the dose is uniform.
[cid:212f04ec-2838-48cb-ba78-a3618364f434]
However, when I divided my geometry in different regions of water (the material is the same, composition, I-value, density, ...), the results show some artefacts at the boundaries, as you can see in the graph below. Same simulation as above but divided in regions at -4cm and 0cm.
[cid:61da5a33-1500-4702-9601-5eed1ac5880a]
I've played with the size of the steps using the FLUKAFIX card and activated single scattering at boundaries using the MULSOPT card, however the artefact is still there.
How can I correct for this?
Many thanks,
Ana
__________________________________________________________________________
You can manage unsubscription from this mailing list at
https://www.fluka.org/fluka.php?id=acc_info
Received on Fri Jun 10 2016 - 13:25:04 CEST