in EMFCUT you have to specify the regions where the threshold applies,
i.e. TARGET as WHAT(4) in your case
If you look into the output file (NewDesignV5-1001.out), you will see
that your 1 keV threshold has not been taken due to the wrong command
F
**************************************************
Francesco Cerutti
CERN-EN/STI
CH-1211 Geneva 23
Switzerland
tel. ++41 22 7678962
fax ++41 22 7668854
On Thu, 23 Feb 2017, Masoomeh Yarmohammadi Satri wrote:
> Dear Fracesco and Giorgi,
>
> Many thanks for the emails. I reduced the transport threshold to 1keV for all the regions (Global) and added the MULSOPT card for switching the single scattering . Unfortunately, it gives no result and the files are empty to plot.
>
> The inp file is been attached to the email
>
>
> Best regards,
> Masoomeh
> ________________________________________
> From: Francesco Cerutti
> Sent: 22 February 2017 12:52
> To: Masoomeh Yarmohammadi Satri
> Cc: Giorgi Kharashvili; FLUKA Discussion List
> Subject: RE: [fluka-discuss]: Minimium
>
> And switch on single scattering with MULSOPT
>
> **************************************************
> Francesco Cerutti
> CERN-EN/STI
> CH-1211 Geneva 23
> Switzerland
> tel. ++41 22 7678962
> fax ++41 22 7668854
>
> On Wed, 22 Feb 2017, Francesco Cerutti wrote:
>
>>
>> Hi Masoomeh,
>>
>> yes, there is a fundamental problem in your input file.
>> You cannot run 45 keV electrons with a transport threshold set by default at
>> 100 keV (as printed in the output file).
>> Lower it down to the 1 keV hard limit mentioned by George through the EMFCUT
>> card
>>
>> Cheers
>>
>> Francesco
>>
>> **************************************************
>> Francesco Cerutti
>> CERN-EN/STI
>> CH-1211 Geneva 23
>> Switzerland
>> tel. ++41 22 7678962
>> fax ++41 22 7668854
>>
>> On Wed, 22 Feb 2017, Masoomeh Yarmohammadi Satri wrote:
>>
>>> Dear George,
>>>
>>> Many thanks for your email.
>>>
>>> I tried for 45keV electron on a Cu target. I receive no data. If there is
>>> a problem in the file?
>>>
>>> Or it is the matter of low energy, Cu target and Fluka with this energy?
>>> If Yes, If you propose other simulation code for this energy and target?
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Masoomeh
>>> ________________________________________
>>> From: George Kharashvili [georgek_at_jlab.org]
>>> Sent: 20 February 2017 15:53
>>> To: Masoomeh Yarmohammadi Satri
>>> Cc: FLUKA Discussion List
>>> Subject: Re: [fluka-discuss]: Minimium
>>>
>>> Dear Masoomeh,
>>>
>>> The low limit of electron transport is 1 keV. However, modeling of 45 keV
>>> electron beam interaction with matter requires special care. From FLUKA
>>> manual Chapter 1.1.7: "The minimum recommended energy for PRIMARY
>>> electrons is about 50 to 100 keV for low-Z materials and 100-200 keV for
>>> heavy materials, unless the single scattering algorithm is used."
>>>
>>> Best regards,
>>> George
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>> From: "Masoomeh Yarmohammadi Satri" <masoomeh.yarmohammadi.satri_at_cern.ch>
>>> To: "FLUKA Discussion List" <fluka-discuss_at_fluka.org>
>>> Sent: Monday, February 20, 2017 8:38:53 AM
>>> Subject: [fluka-discuss]: Minimium
>>>
>>> Dear All,
>>>
>>> If there is a minimum level of energy for defining as beam energy in
>>> Fluka. If Fluka is useful for 45keV electron beam energy hitting a target?
>>>
>>>
>>> Best regards,
>>> Masoomeh
>>
>>
>
__________________________________________________________________________
You can manage unsubscription from this mailing list at
https://www.fluka.org/fluka.php?id=acc_info
Received on Thu Feb 23 2017 - 15:58:16 CET