Re: no decay happened

From: Sebastien WURTH (wurth@ipno.in2p3.fr)
Date: Fri Jul 07 2006 - 10:21:35 CEST

  • Next message: Sebastien WURTH: "Re: RADDECAY problems"

    Hello,

    You assign 3 decay times to 3 detectors, each card overwrites the
    previous one and that's the reason why you have only one data set when
    your simulation works.
    Do you have the latest version of FLUKA release ? There was a bug using
    RADDECAY card, problem which was fixed since.
    Please flollow that link :
    http://www.fluka.org/web_archive/earchive/new-fluka-discuss/0418.html
    and maybe this one :
    http://www.fluka.org/web_archive/earchive/new-fluka-discuss/0406.html

    Best regards.
    Sebastien.

    Guo Wen a écrit :

    > Dear FLUKA experts:
    > I have been working for several days on solving the decay problems
    > with FLUKA,but no 'useful results'(?).first,the FLUKA collapses when
    > use RADDECAY card on redhat linux 9.0 platform;when I use others
    > platforms on virtual machine system(because the installation
    > problems), FLUKA run rightly,but the result data are not I expected:I
    > request three cooling time decays,the result contains only one set of
    > data.I test a simple calculation(as follow) ,the result is the same. I
    > don't know if the RADDECAY card really activated.I am very anxious. I
    > would be grateful if you could give me some help.
    >
    > Guo Wen
    > input file:
    > TITLE
    > Isotropic Proton Source
    > DEFAULTS
    > NEW-DEFA
    > *---+----1----+----2----+----3----+----4----+----5----+----6----+----7----+----*
    >
    > BEAM -1.000 0.0 100000.0 0.0 0.0 1.0
    > PROTON
    > BEAMPOS 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
    > POSITIVE
    > * Source start at (0.0,0.0,0.0)
    > *---+----1----+----2----+----3----+----4----+----5----+----6----+----7----+----*
    >
    > GEOBEGIN 0.0
    > COMBINAT
    > SPHRICAL SHELL PHANTOM
    > *---+----1----+----2----+----3----+----4----+----5----+----6----+----7----+----*
    >
    > SPH 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0
    > SPH 2 0.0 0.0 0.0 110.0
    > SPH 3 0.0 0.0 0.0 200.0
    > SPH 4 0.0 0.0 0.0 210.0
    > SPH 5 0.0 0.0 0.0 500.0
    > END
    > *---+----1----+----2----+----3----+----4----+----5----+----6----+----7----+----*
    >
    > 1 5 1
    > 2 5 -1 2
    > 3 5 -2 3
    > 4 5 -3 4
    > 5 5 -4 5
    > END
    > GEOEND
    > *---+----1----+----2----+----3----+----4----+----5----+----6----+----7----+----*
    >
    > * Vacuum Region
    > ASSIGNMA 2.0 1.0
    > * black hole
    > ASSIGNMA 1.0 5.0
    > ASSIGNMA 2.0 4.0
    > *lead shell
    > ASSIGNMA 17.0 2.0 3.0
    > *
    > *---+----1----+----2----+----3----+----4----+----5----+----6----+----7----+----*
    >
    > IRRPROFI 3600000. 1.5E15
    > RADDECAY 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
    > DCYTIMES 1.0 3600.0 86400.0 604800.0 2592000.
    > *DCYSCORE 1.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0
    > 1.0 USRTRACK
    > *DCYSCORE 2.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0
    > 1.0 USRTRACK
    > *DCYSCORE 3.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0
    > 1.0 USRTRACK
    > *USRTRACK -1. 7. +30. 4.0 +1.0
    > 100. photon
    > *USRTRACK 1.000 0.001 &
    > *
    > DCYSCORE 1.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 2.0
    > RESNUCLE
    > DCYSCORE 2.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 2.0
    > RESNUCLE
    > DCYSCORE 3.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 2.0
    > RESNUCLE
    > RESNUCLE 3.0 +70.0 2.0
    > PIPRESNU
    > RESNUCLE 3.0 +71.0 3.0
    > PIPRESNU
    > RANDOMIZ 1.0
    > START 100.0
    > STOP


  • Next message: Sebastien WURTH: "Re: RADDECAY problems"

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.6 : Fri Jul 07 2006 - 10:39:23 CEST