Re: FLUKA: Kaons in FLUKA


To Bob Zwaska <zwaska@mail.utexas.edu>
From Giuseppe Battistoni <Giuseppe.Battistoni@mi.infn.it>
Date Wed, 14 Feb 2001 14:43:14 +0100 (MET)
cc "fluka-discuss@listbox.cern.ch" <fluka-discuss@listbox.cern.ch>, kostin@hep.utexas.edu, kopp@hep.utexas.edu, lyukov@hep.utexas.edu
In-Reply-To <3A89C25A.42A16BD3@mail.utexas.edu >
Reply-To Giuseppe Battistoni <Giuseppe.Battistoni@mi.infn.it>
Sender owner-fluka-discuss@listbox.cern.ch

Probably I can able to give the explanation:

FLUKA considers in different ways neutral Kaons according to their origin:
If kaons0 are coming from the decay of some resonance,
like for instance a phi particle, which can be produced in the
hadronization stage, then they are labelled KAONLONG
and KAONSHRT.
Otherwise, if coming directly from the hadronization chain, they are
labelled KAONZERO and AKAONZER, according to their parton
content. These kaons, during particle
transport, are then treated as a proper combination of KAONLONG and
KAONSHRT in order to have the right decay properties.
>From the point of view of hadronic interactions instead, only KAONZERO and
AKAONZER have meaning. Therefore, if a KAONLONG has to interact with
another hadron it is first decomposed in KAONZERO/AKAONZER

I ask for confirmation to FLUKA authors.


        Giuseppe

On Tue, 13 Feb 2001, Bob Zwaska wrote:

> Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2001 17:25:14 -0600
> From: Bob Zwaska <zwaska@mail.utexas.edu>
> To: "fluka-discuss@listbox.cern.ch" <fluka-discuss@listbox.cern.ch>
> Cc: kostin@hep.utexas.edu, kopp@hep.utexas.edu, lyukov@hep.utexas.edu
> Subject: FLUKA: Kaons in FLUKA
> 
> Fluka users,
> 
> We have been simulating a 120 GeV proton beam incident on a carbon target 
>and
> are interested in the hadron production.  We are having trouble interpreting
> what is meant by the distinction of neutral Kaons: KAONSHRT, KAONLONG,
> KAONZERON, and AKAONZER.  From 5000 incident protons we register currents of
> 23 KAONLONGs, 0 KAONSHRTs, 2158 KAONZEROs, and 1315 AKAONZERs.  These 
>numbers
> represent the particle current through a plane just ahead of our target, so
> the K-shorts may have decayed before being counted.  Anyhow, how am I to
> interpret these numbers?
> 
> In other work we have simply chosen one half of the K0s and anti-K0s to be
> K-shorts, and the other K-longs.  Here, however, we are presented with four
> types of distinct particles.
> 
> Thanks for any help,
> 
> Bob Zwaska
> University of Texas - Austin
> 
> 



Your name :
Your email :
Subject :
Body :
 

Partial thread listing: