Dear Alexander,
I am not sure if I understand correctly your question, but I believe
that these two old and important messages might shed more light on your
problem:
http://www.fluka.org/web_archive/earchive/new-fluka-discuss/8056.html
http://www.fluka.org/web_archive/earchive/new-fluka-discuss/7931.html
Hope this helps!
Andrea
Il 23/09/2019 21:03, Ševčik Aleksandras ha scritto:
>
> Dear experts,
>
> Due to the nature of several existing interpretations in the different
> fields (and ongoing discussions I face), could you please advise if
> deposited energy calculated in Fluka is the same as absorbed energy
> (mean energy transferred from the secondary charged particles to the
> absorber) in the case of photon irradiation. The wording may imply
> that “not all deposited energy may be absorbed”, so interpretation
> that deposited energy = absorbed energy + some losses (?). I will
> appreciate very much the elaborate comment on this from any expert in
> this subject.
>
> Regards
>
> Alexander
>
--
========================================================================
Dr. Andrea Fontana tel: +39 0382 987991
Istituto Nazionale fax: +39 0382 423241
di Fisica Nucleare
Sezione di Pavia e-mail: andrea.fontana_at_pv.infn.it
Via Bassi 6 web : www.pv.infn.it/~fontana
27100 PAVIA, Italy
========================================================================
__________________________________________________________________________
You can manage unsubscription from this mailing list at https://www.fluka.org/fluka.php?id=acc_info
Received on Tue Sep 24 2019 - 00:14:58 CEST