RE:[fluka-discuss]: ISOTOPE flag in BEAM with source.f user routine

From: Ricardo Manuel Dos Santos Augusto <r.s.augusto_at_cern.ch>
Date: Sat, 1 Feb 2020 20:00:52 +0000

Dear Raksha,

When you ask for Mo-99 as isotope you will get Tc-99m and its decay.

You can simulate Tc-99m directly, considering HI-PROPE as:

*...+....1....+....2....+....3....+....4....+....5....+....6....+....7....+....
HI-PROPE 43. 99. -1.

Regarding the source.f, yes you can. One of many references to set up the
source:

http://www.fluka.org/web_archive/earchive/new-fluka-discuss/2887.html

As for your last question the answer is also yes, you should give the max
energy (you can round it up to 1 MeV).

Best regards,
Ricardo


//Ricardo dos Santos Augusto
TRIUMF-EH&S
Office: +1 604 222 10 47 (6375)
4004 Wesbrook Mall,
Vancouver, BC V6T 2A3, Canada//
________________________________________
De : owner-fluka-discuss_at_mi.infn.it [owner-fluka-discuss_at_mi.infn.it] de la
part de Raksha Rajput [rakshak_at_britatom.gov.in]
Envoyé : vendredi 31 janvier 2020 8:39
À : fluka-discuss
Objet : [fluka-discuss]: ISOTOPE flag in BEAM with source.f user routine

Dear experts,

I would like to simulate Mo-99 radioisotpoe.
May I know whether I can use ISOTOPE in BEAM card with HI-PROP, DCYSCORE
and RADDECAY to simulate the same? In this case, as I understand it will
consider the decay of Mo-99. Would it also consider Tc-99m decay ? If not,
how to do that ?
Secondly, what if, I would like to give three prime photons of Mo-99 in
source.f routine ? Can i do that ? In this case, what will be the Energy
in BEAM card ? Should I put max. 778 keV there among the three photons?

Thanks in advance.
Regards,
Raksha.




__________________________________________________________________________
You can manage unsubscription from this mailing list at
https://www.fluka.org/fluka.php?id=acc_info



__________________________________________________________________________
You can manage unsubscription from this mailing list at https://www.fluka.org/fluka.php?id=acc_info
Received on Sat Feb 01 2020 - 23:09:49 CET

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Sat Feb 01 2020 - 23:10:01 CET