NOTE: I apploguise if you have received this message mutliple times.
Attachments can be found here:
http://hep.lancs.ac.uk/~parnmatt/FLUKA/
Hi Vittorio,
Sorry for the late reply, something else needed my attention.
I have compiled, linked and ran using the example, my predecessors, and
my own SOURCE subroutines, and ran the builtin and default. For each of
them I redirected the stdout and stderr to a file.
I have included those files, and all other generated files (*.err,
*.log, *.out, etc.) as well as the SOURCE subroutines and input files.
I have done this for both my laptop running Arch and my workstation
running SL6.6, and have attached them in compressed archives.
I have also attached the commands I used to do this, for clarity and
to ensure I am not missing fundamental understanding in the linking
process. (Which I might be).
The SOURCE subroutine is just the same as the example, but with the
weighting calculated differently. My subroutine looks radically
different, however it is just written in a different style.
If there is anything else that I can send, please let me know. It is
imperative I get this simple thing working.
Best regards,
On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 08:09:53PM +0200, Vittorio Boccone wrote:
> Dear Matthew,
> sure Arch is a rolling distro. What I meant was "versions" plural of the
> base-devel pack group. Anyway I see I've got almost the same devel packages
> group as you.
>
> gcc/gfortran 4.9.1 is not what I would call stable for the centos.
>
> To get a new g++/gfortran suite on the CentOS I would try the devtoolset
> 2.1 which provides all the gcc.gfortran 4.8.2 in a nutshell.
> [see http://linux.web.cern.ch/linux/devtoolset/#dts21 and other RH/CentOS
> posts on the list]
>
> I have some simulation which uses a custom source routing which are both
> running on SL6.6 or Arch.
> It's a bit complicate to reproduce your error w/o the input or source or to
> give you some hint w/o the log or err files.
> Could you post some more detail?
> Best,
> V.
>
> On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 6:27 PM, Matthew Parnell <m.parnell_at_lancaster.ac.uk>
> wrote:
>
> > Hi Vittorio,
> >
> > Arch is a rolling release, therefore there is no 'version' of it.
> > However I have using gfortran 4.9.2 20150304, ld 2.25.0, and fluka
> > 2011.2c gfor64bitAA.
> >
> > I have attempted to compile and link the example SOURCE subrouteine,
> > $FLUPRO/usermvax/source.f
> >
> > I am not getting errors or warnings in the compliation or linking,
> > however the program stops running after 5s. Similar to my own SOURCE and
> > the SOURCE by my predecessor [which he apparently got to work].
> >
> > What is interesting, is leaving the SOURCE command within the input file
> > and running fluka runs for a similar time of 5s, whereas leaving out the
> > SOURCE card runs correctly for around 12mins.
> >
> > To ensure it's not my laptop, I tried with my workstation running
> > Scientific Linux 6.6, with the gfortran updated to 4.9.1 [FLUKA needed
> > gfortran >= 4.6, SL6 has 4.4.7].
> >
> > My workstation seems to have the same issues. My SOURCE, my predecessors
> > SOURCE, and the example SOURCE subroutines.
> >
> > However I both my laptop (Arch) and my workstation (SL6.6) work without
> > the SOURCE card with the default rfluka, and run for around 12mins, with
> > output.
> >
> > Now I guess I am running it wrong and/or it's a linking issue, not my
> > source, and not my input file.
> >
> > Any ideas?
> >
> > --
> > Matthew Parnell
> > m.parnell_at_lancaster.ac.uk
--
Matthew Parnell
m.parnell_at_lancaster.ac.uk
__________________________________________________________________________
You can manage unsubscription from this mailing list at https://www.fluka.org/fluka.php?id=acc_info
Received on Mon Apr 27 2015 - 16:45:03 CEST