Hi Tristan, from the plot I do not understand if thesis slice or the profile integrated on the X axis (orthogonal to the screen surface…)
In principle you would need a better statistic, you should plot the usrbin error and check that the error in you region of interest for the two plots is below what you consider good for your simulation case.
Best,
V.
> On 29 Sep 2016, at 14:43, tristan.davenne_at_stfc.ac.uk wrote:
>
> Dear FLUKA experts,
>
> I am scoring net charge and energy deposited in a target. The target has an incident proton beam coming from left to right.
>
> I have enough primary particles to give an extremely smooth contour of the energy deposition (shown below), and yet the contour of net charge is very rough, appearing as though there are not enough primary particles.
>
> Is there a fundamental reason why the net charge plot is so noisy by comparison to the energy deposition plot? Is this physically correct or do I need better statistics?
>
> Net charge
> <image001.png>
> Energy Deposition
> <image002.png>
> Kind Regards
>
> Tristan
__________________________________________________________________________
You can manage unsubscription from this mailing list at
https://www.fluka.org/fluka.php?id=acc_info
Received on Mon Oct 03 2016 - 21:35:35 CEST