Hello
I think you should change the PHYSICS card (SDUM=EVAPORAT) with WHAT(1)=3 (New Evap. with heavy fragments).
For 12-C ion it should be relevant.
I would also add another PHYSICS card with SDUM=COALESCE)
Giuseppe Battistoni
On 02/04/2017 08:50 PM, Mrakbari2015_at_ast.ui.ac.ir wrote:
> Dear FLUKA/FLAIR Experts
> I am simulating a 220 MeV/n carbon beam impinging on the water phantom and I am going to calculate the depth dose. However the
> simulated depth dose has a good agreement in bragg peak position (less than 2 percent difference with exprimental data) but it does
> not have an acceptable prediction in peak to platea ratio (more than 20 percent difference with experimental data). I attached my
> input file. which physical events in the particles transport affect on peak to platea ratio? for verification with exprimental data,
> is it important to verify peak to platea ratio in addition to bragg peak depth?
> which parameter should be optimise for reseanable verification?
>
> Best Regards
> Mahmoudreza
>
__________________________________________________________________________
You can manage unsubscription from this mailing list at
https://www.fluka.org/fluka.php?id=acc_info
Received on Sun Feb 05 2017 - 02:02:17 CET